On the Issues

Who is Rob Quist?

Many men left a footstep in the story of the United States in politics, music, economics, and human rights. In the case of the following man, he accomplished what many could not in the path: to be able to catch the spirit of the West with his songs. And that is something that only few could do it, and his legacy will live forever because of this.

Who is Rob Quist? This is the purpose of the article of today. We want to know him, his personality and life and to describe his trajectory as an artist.

Rob Quist’s origins

His full name is Robert Ernest Quist. He was born in Cut Bank, Montana in January 5th, 1948. He loved so much playing basketball that he ended playing it for the University of Montana. Soon before, he would eventually be interested in music, as he would join the Mission Mountain Band and finally becoming a country musician in the 1966.

Musical career

The Mission Mountain Band was a bluegrass a country rock band that played their first performance in the Rare Earth in 1971. They were on tour nationally, and they succeeded in every place they visited. They ended playing in local events such as the University of Montana’s Aber Day kegger, and in the national television show Hee Haw and the ACB Cheryl Ladd Special. 

When the band finally broke up in 1982, Rob joined Terry Robinson and Kurt Bergeron to form the Montana Band, which existed to your extensively and took first prize in the Willie Nelson country challenge. Sadly, Quist left the Montana band when a tragic plane crash took the lives of Robinson, Bergeron and the other members of the band. 

As solo singer, Quist formed a backup band named the Great Northern. Together with the band, Rob Quist performed music with the North Dakota State Symphony, the Fairbanks Alaska Symphony, the Glacier Orchestra as well as the Billings, Butte, Helena and Missoula Symphonies. He wrote and recorded national television and radio ads for the Levis 501 Jeans, and its impact has been so great that “Blue Jean Love Affair” was heard in the top 20 Country Music Markets. His song “Close to the Land” became the Song of the Year at the Texas Music Awards, and his original song “America… Pass it on” and video won a Finalist Award at the International Wildlife Film Festival for National Geographic. 

In the years to come, he has published more than 15 CDs of mostly original music about the lives and history of the people of Montana and the West. Not only he left a mark in the music of the US in general, but in Montana, being honored in the University of Montana with a Hall of Honors – being said that thanks to him, the essence and the spirit of the West was caught in all the songs he left of the nation.

Many of the first songs of the young Rob were recorded by Martin Murphey and Loretta Lynn, and by the time he managed to be appointed to the Montana Arts Council by the governor of the moment, Brian Schweitzer. 

Rob Quist and his political career

Before people could realize it, Quist was one of the most important supporters of the Democratic Party. He used to practice the “prairie populism” by assisting a single-payer healthcare system opposing the AHCA – defining many of the political thoughts that would be traits for his future campaign as a politician. 

After all the walkthrough of Rob’s life as a musician, we have one thing left: part of his political career. On January 4th of 2017, Quist informed to everyone that he would look for the Democratic nomination for the special election in order to full the US House seat held by Ryan Zinke (this because Zinke was going to be nominated to be Secretary of the Interior).

Soon he started his campaign, and after it Rob Quist would have to face Greg Gianforte as his political opponent for the role they wanted to obtain. After a polemic incident with Gianforte assaulting a reporter from The Guardian, voters already picked their choosings and although the situation was tense, Quist was politically defeated in the elections, getting only 44% of approval meanwhile Gianforte had 50%, although the results that Quist received were phenomenal.

In the current times, Quist is aiming to take the 2020 elections for Montana. It is too soon to know if he is going to take the sit this time, but what we know is that he is fighting with everything he has. He strongly believes that the US is a country of inequality, mainly because of the taxes that crush the life of the working classes. There other topics that we wants to deal, such as global warming, miscarriage, reproductive rights and even military intervention. If he is going to fulfill what he desires is something that only time will tell. Meanwhile, we are going to be listening his CDs in order to know his ideas better than the most.

On the Issues

Rob Quist, US politics and 2020 elections

It is curious to note that in the history of United Sates, famous artists have had important roles in politics. They are already famous per se, giving them a lot of advantage in comparison to other politicians. 

There have been actors like Clint Eastwood, Sean Duffy, Steven Seagal and of course Arnold Schwarzenegger that ran for offices in their times. It is understood that an artist has the potential of taking political positions because of the approval that people has on them. 

Even Ronald Reagan, the 40th President of the United States was an actor before being president. Now, there is another artist that is aiming to reach to the heavens with his political aspirations, and that man is non-other than Rob Quist.

Rob Quist and his career

Being one of the most important singers of the story of Montana, Rob Quist was awarded for being such an artist. Many of its fans recognized him as the one who caught the spirit of the West in his songs. This gave him a great popularity, and together with his ideals, he started a political career in January.

Rob Quist and his introduction to politics

Quist announced on January 4th 2017 that he would want to be nominated for the Democratic Party in the election to fill the US House seat held in Ryan Zinke. The former Governor Brian Schweitzer endorsed Quist, and selected him as a party nominee. Ç

2017 Elections

In the moment, he talked about his qualifications in his work with the state: as he argued that he has a lifelong experience travelling in and around Montana. Bernie Sanders and the Our Revolution organization endorsed him in the race and help him with his campaign. Quist direct opposition in the elections was Greg Gianforte, and although they were potentially equal in their respective fields, Gianforte ended winning the elections with a 50% of approval meanwhile Quist only could get 44% (undoubtedly an amazing number of voters).

What several reporters and political analysts think about Quist is that he seeks an economic fairness platform. Instead of focusing on all the scandals made by Trump, he was gathering all his attention into policy decisions by the president and congressional republicans. 

Rob Quist vision about economy and taxes

According to his thoughts, Quist strongly believes that US should move to a single payer healthcare system. He opposed efforts to retake the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (aka. Obamacare) stating in 2017 that doing it would raise the quality of health costs for the working classes of Montana. What is interesting about his comments is that this is a very consistent reality, as the Kaiser Family Foundation made an analysis confirming it and this also would make a tax cut for millionaires.

Quist senses that US has a serious problem with inequality. Tax breaks for the rich rise up the level of inequality in their society, and he is calling for tax cuts for the working class.

Thoughts about resources of the country

Additionally, Quist is openly against many current issues of the state such as military intervention or the privatization of federal lands. He is indeed looking for politics that would allow transfer money from the federal military budget towards healthcare or social security. He is also interested in the clean coal technology, and other energy sources such as wind, solar, biomass and geothermal energy resources.

Rob Quist, LGTB and abortion

Quist have sworn to protect the people against the privatization of public lands, and he believes marijuana should be legalized, saying that the war on drugs has been a failure. Many support him now that he is agree with the marriage of people of the same sex, and thinks that supports the access of birth control, preventive screenings and abortion rights. In his opinion, women should respect regarding their reproductive rights. He expresses that equity for women must be paid. 

Climate change and Republicans

One of the most important issues about Quist is that he accepts the scientific consensus on climate change, something that most Republicans are against of. He expresses that climate change is crucial, as global warming could have a negative impact in the farms, ranches and economy of Montana and all the country.

Rob Quist and what he thinks about 2020 elections

The elections of 2020 are going to be crucial for Montana, and that is why Rob Quist is communicating people to be wise about the importance of their votes. Will Gianforte be elected again? Opening the shipping ports from Washington to Montana coal using the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution is crucial; it is something that Quist has been looking for. The environmental interests in the region are an important point, as people should be keeping in mind that they must be concerned about climate problems and how they would allow Montana’s higher quality of coal into the Asian market to reduce the atmospheric pollution. 

Indeed, the republicans still pledge Trump to build The Wall to curtail drug abuse, which is recognized as one Montana’s main problems. That is why Rob Quist is certainly sure that the elections of 2020 are going to clarify what the future holds for Montana and the US.

On the Issues

Companies and Government decisions that destroy the environment for profit in the US

As technology expands its impact on people’s everyday life, more of us understand the cost of being aware of the truth that surrounds us. In this particular case, the truth to discuss is the environmental one which is of great importance to the survival of not only the plants, animals, and ecosystems but human survival as well. The topic on environmental and climate change has been both relevant and talked about since 1970, yet many governments, companies, and corporations have taken at least 30 years to take serious action towards committing to find environmentally friendly ways to keep their business.

Nowadays the discussion on finding a renewable source of energy, food, and supplies have taken the urgent tone. The reason why the tone has escalated that much is because the truth about our reality is getting to close and to fast to the term catastrophe. The most recent report on climate change was shown in the UN Environment’s sixth Global Environment Outlook (2019), and it showed in its GEO report how urgent and drastic changes will need to be made in order to prevent one million species to disappear, as aztecaporno disappeared from one moment, to another, worsening of shortages, and more devastating wildfire.

Climate Change Consequences on People, Green Agreements, and Goals for this Century

As the time to face the consequences of our reckless actions is imminent, hundreds of scientists, peer reviewers, institutions, and partners have come forward to inform the rest of the world that we can still change our fatal destiny. In other words, we still have time to right our wrongs and lowering the global temperature. According to GEO and Nasa, since 2001, the warmest years of the planet have accompanied the new millennium; in fact, the year 2016 ranks as the warmest on records. The consequences of these high temperatures have caused, on the one hand, more intense videos de incesto, glaciers to shrink precipitating large chunks of ice on rivers and causing an accelerated rise on the sea level.

On the other hand, the impact on cities, countries, and their economy is measurable; for instance, in Houston, Florida and Puerto Rico which have been devastated by these natural disasters recently. These disasters such as floods, for example, have been persistent and ubiquitous not only in the United States of America but also in Asia where thousands of land crops have been flooded, which means that the economy of many farmers and cities have been severely affected. In addition, and as incredible it may seem, even though the consequences have directly affected the economy, and well-being of thousands of people, many governments around the world refuse to strongly commit to lowering or eradicate the cause of millions of dollars of expenditures for natural disasters.

Nevertheless, in 2015 many countries agreed to work towards lowering the earth temperature below 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels to the end of the century and also to gathering efforts to limiting the temperature increase even further to 1.5 degrees Celsius. This international agreement was well received for many countries which worked to set their own goals to contribute to the general goal. The bad news is that in 2017 the President of the United States Donald Trump announced that the U.S would cease all participation in the Paris Agreement on Climate Change Mitigation. The United States of America is one of the top greenhouse gas emissions countries due to companies such as Chevron, ExxonMobil, and Peabody Energy.

Companies Destroying the Environment for Profit

These companies that constitute the Oil and Coal Industry are responsible for disastrous oil spills, air contamination, and death of probably thousands of people. Even though they have been fined for hundreds of millions of dollars for the damage they are causing to ecosystems, and drinking water, they have been reluctant to make significant efforts to move towards renewable energy.

In addition to it, companies that pollute the ocean with plastic are also located in the United States and these are Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Nestlé, Danone, Procter and Gamble, and Colgate-Palmolive. In regard to other economic sectors, the transportation industry is responsible for 29 percent of the 2017 greenhouse gas emissions in the United States; the Electricity production sector falls second, and it accounts for 28 percent of greenhouse gas emissions and in place number three the industry is responsible for 22.2 percent of 2017 greenhouse gas emissions.

All these companies as Chevron, Suiteporno.com, ExxonMobil, Peabody Energy, Coca-Cola, Nestlé and Procter and Gamble continue today to emit important greenhouse gas emissions and plastic pollution thanks to the removal of environmental regulation from the government and so keeping the American economy growing. However, the story that lies behind “America First” is an environmentally damaging one that keeps putting the world a bit closer to natural disasters. Nowadays is known that companies such as ExxonMobil have funded multiple organizations denying anthropogenic global warming; nevertheless, many other companies and government are taking more concrete action to invest in renewable energy, and environmentally friendly products that fill the needs of the market without contaminating the world we live today.

On the Issues

Main Issues in the Current Healthcare System in the US

The current healthcare system in the US is a very hot subject among politicians in the Republican Party -which holds the majority of votes in the Senate and is also the party leading the White House today and the Democratic Party- and the Democratic party. These extended discussions are of course directly proportionate to the importance and the impact it has on millions of American citizens lives in terms of their health and economy. Therefore, even though this is a complicated topic to understand here are a few things to highlight about why is the US Healthcare System so expensive and yet so broken?

To try to get our heads around it, there are some highly respected private foundations such as the Commonwealth Fund that ranks the world’s best and worst healthcare systems around the world. In the 2017 study, the United States Healthcare system performance ranked last among the 11 countries with the highest income. In other words, the healthcare system falls short by quite a lot in terms of Access, Equity, Health Care Outcomes, and Administrative Efficiency. In this study, the top three healthcare systems are The United Kingdom, Australia, and the Netherlands.

The problems with the United States healthcare system are first, the country has the highest per capita health expenditure and a large percentage of its GDP goes right into health care way more than any other country. Second, the United States is the only high-incoming country that lacks universal health insurance coverage; although after the Affordable Care Act-aka Obamacare- the country made great efforts to expand that coverage making it mandatory to everyone to have health insurance; plus, the country invested over one trillion dollars in the subsidiary health care system Medicare. However, this decision also made more Americans face higher income deductibles and out-of-pocket costs at a greater scale in comparison to other citizens of other countries.

To this point is evident that the major issues the healthcare system in America have as the study shows Access, Administrative Efficiency, Equity and Health Care Outcome. To try to understand why the States falls short on access then it’s crucial to see what people say about affordability regarding the cost of health care. In this aspect, politicians in America are focused on getting more people health insurance than studying the best approach to lower the cost of medical care that will open the door to “broader access to care, lower insurance premiums, and ultimately better health” as Griff Jenkins would say. Nevertheless, the preferred strategy which was to force million Americans into getting health insurance cost the government over 1 trillion dollars in tax revenue to “subsidize premiums and adds numerous regulations and taxes, many of which counterproductively increase premiums”. The result, getting any health care in America is expensive, to say the least, therefore even though many citizens have insurance very few have quality care and access to precise and accurate medical care.

On the other hand, in terms of administrative efficiency the United States ranks last because there are too much paperwork conflicts regarding coverage, therefore as OLGA KHAZAN wrote “coverage, in general, is great, it’s not ideal that different insurance plans cover different treatments and procedures, forcing doctors to spend precious hours coordinating with insurance companies to provide care.” This is significantly important when it comes to quality medical care, time-saving to have come up with a good diagnosis, and ultimately to actually perform the best approach in a procedure on the patient. These key decisions do affect the health outcome of a patient in a life-threatening situation.

In addition to it, there is another distinctive indicator that shows the negative consequences of the system major issues, this is related to the America life expectancy at age 60. For the past decade, the life expectancy of an average American dropped to 60 as a result of failure in quality health care, difficulty to get access to health care and an “inefficient and under-resourced primary care system”. Primary care is the first step to not only preventing chronic diseases but to assure people a healthy control in every stage in their lives. Therefore, any primary care physician should be able to have seamless coordinated care between them and the specialist, so they can have the best approach a patient can hope for.

The reality is much harder, and the average American is paying it with their quality of life and well-being. To conclude, the major issues in the current health care system in America come as a consequence of knowingly overlooking the main problem. This occurs because the people making these decisions are not part of the health system, instead they are politicians that choose to come up with strategies to deal with the consequences instead of dealing with the problem itself. The cost of medical care itself is the core problem to deal with, not the consequences such as premiums and coverage, at least that is what experts say.

PreviousNext